Advertisement
KMSWF vs SMSOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMSWF is a Hold and SMSOF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KMSWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KMSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SMSOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KMSWF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMSOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KMSWF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- SMSOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KMSWF (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMSOF (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -12.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wholesale Distributors (+3.67% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
| KMSWF | SMSOF | KMSWF / SMSOF | |
| Capitalization | 46.3M | 3.07B | 2% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 48.378 | -37.491 | -129% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.05 | 7.52 | 333% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 658M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 2.32B | - |
KMSWF | SMSOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMSOF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as KMSWF (38). This means that SMSOF’s stock grew similarly to KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.
SMSOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as KMSWF (100). This means that SMSOF’s stock grew similarly to KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.
SMSOF's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMSWF (89). This means that SMSOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMSWF’s over the last 12 months.
KMSWF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSOF (86). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew similarly to SMSOF’s over the last 12 months.
KMSWF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMSOF (63). This means that KMSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMSOF’s over the last 12 months.
| KMSWF | SMSOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 31% | 4 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 33% | 4 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 44% |
Advertisement
KMSWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMSWF has been closely correlated with TSIHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMSWF jumps, then TSIHF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMSWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMSWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TSIHF - KMSWF | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| PUMSY - KMSWF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| MONRF - KMSWF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MONRY - KMSWF | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
| SMSOF - KMSWF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SMSOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSOF and CDGXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSOF and CDGXF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMSOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMSOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CDGXF - SMSOF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SMSEY - SMSOF | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.00% | ||
| PMMAF - SMSOF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MONRF - SMSOF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MONRY - SMSOF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||