KMRPF
Price
$4.47
Change
+$0.09 (+2.05%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
516.17M
WLBMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
60.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMRPF vs WLBMF

Header iconKMRPF vs WLBMF Comparison
Open Charts KMRPF vs WLBMFBanner chart's image
Kenmare Resources
Price$4.47
Change+$0.09 (+2.05%)
Volume$3.68K
Capitalization516.17M
Wallbridge Mining
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$58.55K
Capitalization60.17M
KMRPF vs WLBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KMRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMRPF vs. WLBMF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMRPF is a Buy and WLBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (KMRPF: $4.47 vs. WLBMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: KMRPF and WLBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMRPF: 48% vs. WLBMF: 25%
Market capitalization -- KMRPF: $516.17M vs. WLBMF: $60.17M
KMRPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $516.17M. WLBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $60.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMRPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWLBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KMRPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WLBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMRPF is a better buy in the long-term than WLBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMRPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLBMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMRPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLBMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMRPF is a better buy in the short-term than WLBMF.

Price Growth

KMRPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.05% price change this week, while WLBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.40% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMRPF($516M) has a higher market cap than WLBMF($60.2M). WLBMF YTD gains are higher at: 16.223 vs. KMRPF (11.684). KMRPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. WLBMF (-7.36M). KMRPF has more cash in the bank: 81.2M vs. WLBMF (29.8M). WLBMF has less debt than KMRPF: WLBMF (26.3K) vs KMRPF (94.9M). KMRPF has higher revenues than WLBMF: KMRPF (526M) vs WLBMF (0).
KMRPFWLBMFKMRPF / WLBMF
Capitalization516M60.2M857%
EBITDA296M-7.36M-4,020%
Gain YTD11.68416.22372%
P/E Ratio2.69N/A-
Revenue526M0-
Total Cash81.2M29.8M272%
Total Debt94.9M26.3K360,837%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMRPF vs WLBMF: Fundamental Ratings
KMRPF
WLBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19100
SMR RATING
1..100
5091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMRPF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLBMF (69). This means that KMRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

KMRPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLBMF (100). This means that KMRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

KMRPF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLBMF (91). This means that KMRPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

WLBMF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as KMRPF (62). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to KMRPF’s over the last 12 months.

KMRPF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLBMF (100). This means that KMRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMRPFWLBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATLPF16.580.75
+4.72%
Atlas Copco AB
ERDCF0.720.01
+0.87%
Erdene Resource Development Corp.
AHEXF29.50N/A
N/A
Adecco Group AG
MAARF8.91N/A
N/A
M&A RESH INST HLDGS INC.
ELRFF0.22N/A
-1.87%
Eastern Platinum Ltd.

KMRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMRPF and SHTLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMRPF and SHTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMRPF
1D Price
Change %
KMRPF100%
N/A
SHTLF - KMRPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
ELBM - KMRPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.42%
WLBMF - KMRPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
NGXXF - KMRPF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
EMOTF - KMRPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
More

WLBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLBMF and LUNMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLBMF and LUNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLBMF
1D Price
Change %
WLBMF100%
+3.00%
LUNMF - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
AZMCF - WLBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
FGOVF - WLBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
IVPAF - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
AAGFF - WLBMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More