KMBIF
Price
$14.33
Change
+$1.31 (+10.06%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
575.38M
MCHVF
Price
$1.51
Change
-$0.07 (-4.43%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMBIF vs MCHVF

Header iconKMBIF vs MCHVF Comparison
Open Charts KMBIF vs MCHVFBanner chart's image
Kambi Group
Price$14.33
Change+$1.31 (+10.06%)
Volume$200
Capitalization575.38M
MGM China Holdings
Price$1.51
Change-$0.07 (-4.43%)
Volume$800
Capitalization5.04B
KMBIF vs MCHVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KMBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMBIF vs. MCHVF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMBIF is a Hold and MCHVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (KMBIF: $14.33 vs. MCHVF: $1.51)
Brand notoriety: KMBIF and MCHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMBIF: 17% vs. MCHVF: 104%
Market capitalization -- KMBIF: $575.38M vs. MCHVF: $5.04B
KMBIF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $575.38M. MCHVF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMBIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KMBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCHVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMBIF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMBIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMBIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MCHVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMBIF is a better buy in the short-term than MCHVF.

Price Growth

KMBIF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +10.07% price change this week, while MCHVF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -4.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHVF($5.04B) has a higher market cap than KMBIF($575M). KMBIF YTD gains are higher at: 49.582 vs. MCHVF (43.810). KMBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.6M vs. MCHVF (-1.06B). MCHVF has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. KMBIF (68.7M). KMBIF has less debt than MCHVF: KMBIF (20.4M) vs MCHVF (30.6B). MCHVF has higher revenues than KMBIF: MCHVF (7.92B) vs KMBIF (173M).
KMBIFMCHVFKMBIF / MCHVF
Capitalization575M5.04B11%
EBITDA62.6M-1.06B-6%
Gain YTD49.58243.810113%
P/E Ratio23.87N/A-
Revenue173M7.92B2%
Total Cash68.7M6.95B1%
Total Debt20.4M30.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMBIF vs MCHVF: Fundamental Ratings
KMBIF
MCHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9883
SMR RATING
1..100
75100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1493
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMBIF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (87). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as KMBIF (98). This means that MCHVF’s stock grew similarly to KMBIF’s over the last 12 months.

KMBIF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (100). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

KMBIF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (54). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

KMBIF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHVF (93). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMBIFMCHVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTCLX77.021.14
+1.50%
MFS Technology R6
HAIAX55.770.50
+0.90%
Hartford Core Equity A
HWVAX12.150.09
+0.75%
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val A
OFVIX21.110.14
+0.67%
O'Shaughnessy Market Leaders Value I
MDODX11.300.03
+0.27%
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity R6

KMBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMBIF and PYTCF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMBIF and PYTCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMBIF
1D Price
Change %
KMBIF100%
N/A
PYTCF - KMBIF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRKZF - KMBIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFDJF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHY - KMBIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
More

MCHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHVF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHVF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVF
1D Price
Change %
MCHVF100%
N/A
SKYZF - MCHVF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYF - MCHVF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYEF - MCHVF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
MCHVY - MCHVF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More