KMB
Price
$103.20
Change
+$2.43 (+2.41%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.44B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$70.94
Change
+$1.79 (+2.59%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
148.83B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMB vs UL

Header iconKMB vs UL Comparison
Open Charts KMB vs ULBanner chart's image
Kimberly-Clark
Price$103.20
Change+$2.43 (+2.41%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization33.44B
Unilever
Price$70.94
Change+$1.79 (+2.59%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization148.83B
KMB vs UL Comparison Chart in %
KMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMB vs. UL commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMB is a StrongBuy and UL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (KMB: $100.77 vs. UL: $69.15)
Brand notoriety: KMB and UL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMB: 96% vs. UL: 118%
Market capitalization -- KMB: $33.44B vs. UL: $148.83B
KMB [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $33.44B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $148.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $360.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KMB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the long-term than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the short-term than UL.

Price Growth

KMB (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

UL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.15% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($149B) has a higher market cap than KMB($33.4B). UL has higher P/E ratio than KMB: UL (23.26) vs KMB (20.73). UL YTD gains are higher at: 5.734 vs. KMB (-0.119). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.3B vs. KMB (3.57B). UL has higher revenues than KMB: UL (59.8B) vs KMB (19.7B).
KMBULKMB / UL
Capitalization33.4B149B22%
EBITDA3.57B11.3B32%
Gain YTD-0.1195.734-2%
P/E Ratio20.7323.2689%
Revenue19.7B59.8B33%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt7.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMB vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
KMB
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6526
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
1197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3140
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (23) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (29). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMB (100). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMB’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's SMR Rating (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for UL (97). This means that KMB’s stock grew significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (63). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (40). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMBUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDX98.224.03
+4.28%
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
VFVA139.860.17
+0.12%
Vanguard US Value Factor ETF
SRHQ40.30N/A
N/A
SRH U.S. Quality GARP ETF
GJH9.75N/A
N/A
Synthetic Fixed-Income Sec STRATS 2004-06
PYPY29.39-6.96
-19.15%
YieldMax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
+1.28%
PG - KMB
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
CL - KMB
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
CLX - KMB
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
CHD - KMB
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
KVUE - KMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
+0.55%
PG - UL
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
CL - UL
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
KMB - UL
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
CHD - UL
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
BDRFY - UL
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
More