KLKLF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
32.5M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STLRF
Price
$1.17
Change
+$0.01 (+0.86%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
175.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KLKLF vs STLRF

Header iconKLKLF vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts KLKLF vs STLRFBanner chart's image
KIRKLAND LAKE DISCOVERIES
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$201.32K
Capitalization32.5M
STLLR GOLD
Price$1.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.86%)
Volume$72.41K
Capitalization175.28M
KLKLF vs STLRF Comparison Chart in %
KLKLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STLRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KLKLF vs. STLRF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLKLF is a Hold and STLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (KLKLF: $0.20 vs. STLRF: $1.16)
Brand notoriety: KLKLF and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLKLF: 316% vs. STLRF: 119%
Market capitalization -- KLKLF: $31.36M vs. STLRF: $173.23M
KLKLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $31.36M. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $173.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $143.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLKLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KLKLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STLRF is a better buy in the long-term than KLKLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KLKLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KLKLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STLRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KLKLF is a better buy in the short-term than STLRF.

Price Growth

KLKLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.50% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +102.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.33% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STLRF($175M) has a higher market cap than KLKLF($32.5M). STLRF YTD gains are higher at: -1.951 vs. KLKLF (-9.091). KLKLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.83M vs. STLRF (-31.25M). STLRF has more cash in the bank: 11.5M vs. KLKLF (1.15M). KLKLF (0) and STLRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KLKLFSTLRFKLKLF / STLRF
Capitalization32.5M175M19%
EBITDA-1.83M-31.25M6%
Gain YTD-9.091-1.951466%
P/E RatioN/A1.22-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.15M11.5M10%
Total DebtN/A1.22M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLKLF vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
KLKLF
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10033
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5029

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLRF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as KLKLF (45). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to KLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KLKLF (100). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to KLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (96). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (39). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KLKLF (100). This means that STLRF’s stock grew significantly faster than KLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLKLFSTLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KLKLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STLRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEBHY3.810.20
+5.40%
Genting Berhad
GTHP0.37N/A
+1.28%
Guided Therapeutics, Inc.
NEMKY23.07N/A
N/A
NEMETSCHEK SE
AKKVF0.82N/A
N/A
AKASTOR ASA ASA
SLMNP850.50N/A
N/A
LYONDELLBASELL ADVANCED POLYMERS INC.

KLKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLKLF and STLRF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLKLF and STLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLKLF
1D Price
Change %
KLKLF100%
+8.11%
STLRF - KLKLF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
HMRFF - KLKLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
LVGLF - KLKLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-10.00%
RSGOF - KLKLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.88%
AMQFF - KLKLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.44%
More

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
-1.53%
PAAS - STLRF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
AGI - STLRF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
AU - STLRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
SAND - STLRF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RGLD - STLRF
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
More