Advertisement
KLKBY vs MNHVF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLKBY is a Hold and MNHVF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KLKBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNHVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KLKBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MNHVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KLKBY’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNHVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KLKBY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
- MNHVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
KLKBY (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -36.70% price change this week, while MNHVF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -3.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.65%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.21% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.58% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| KLKBY | MNHVF | KLKBY / MNHVF | |
| Capitalization | 5.14B | 11.8B | 44% |
| EBITDA | 2.73B | 1.02B | 269% |
| Gain YTD | -50.104 | 16.960 | -295% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.58 | 23.94 | 48% |
| Revenue | 24.4B | 5.65B | 432% |
| Total Cash | 3.15B | 227M | 1,386% |
| Total Debt | 12.6B | 2.66B | 475% |
KLKBY | MNHVF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KLKBY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MNHVF (30). This means that KLKBY’s stock grew similarly to MNHVF’s over the last 12 months.
MNHVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as KLKBY (100). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew similarly to KLKBY’s over the last 12 months.
MNHVF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as KLKBY (97). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew similarly to KLKBY’s over the last 12 months.
MNHVF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLKBY (97). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLKBY’s over the last 12 months.
MNHVF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KLKBY (98). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew significantly faster than KLKBY’s over the last 12 months.
| KLKBY | MNHVF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 31% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 8% | 6 days ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 27 days ago 29% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
KLKBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KLKBY and RSSFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLKBY and RSSFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLKBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLKBY | 100% | N/A | ||
| RSSFF - KLKBY | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SALRY - KLKBY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNHVF - KLKBY | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SALRF - KLKBY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SARDY - KLKBY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MNHVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNHVF and MHGVY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNHVF and MHGVY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNHVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNHVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MHGVY - MNHVF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SALRY - MNHVF | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LND - MNHVF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LMNR - MNHVF | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.54% | ||
| CALM - MNHVF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.53% | ||
More | ||||