Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGNX vs RGEBX
KLGNX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLGNX vs RGEBX
NYLI WMC Growth Investor Class
Price$50.60
Change-$3.74 (-6.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets994.72M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
KLGNX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGNX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGNX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLGNX (995M). KLGNX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLGNX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLGNX (13 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). KLGNX (1.41) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). KLGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGNX: RGEBX (250) vs KLGNX (2500). KLGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.15 vs. RGEBX (1.80). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. KLGNX (2.97).
| KLGNX | RGEBX | KLGNX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.08 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.08 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.112 | -1.057 | 389% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 995M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.15 | 1.80 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.17 | 41.63 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.97 | 9.88 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.05 | 110.02 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement