Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGNX vs RGACX
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGNX vs RGACX
NYLI WMC Growth Investor Class
Price$53.56
Change+$0.30 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGNX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGNX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLGNX (1.04B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLGNX: RGACX (0.07) vs KLGNX (0.00). KLGNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGNX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). KLGNX (1.41) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). KLGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGNX: RGACX (250) vs KLGNX (2500). KLGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.45 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. KLGNX (18.18).
| KLGNX | RGACX | KLGNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.94 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.055 | 17.655 | 80% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.45 | 11.01 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.66 | 70.57 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.18 | 37.85 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.60 | 96.78 | 72% |