Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGNX vs RGACX
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGNX vs RGACX
NYLI WMC Growth Investor Class
Price$54.08
Change-$1.13 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGNX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGNX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. KLGNX (1.05B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLGNX: RGACX (0.07) vs KLGNX (0.00). KLGNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGNX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). KLGNX (1.41) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). KLGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGNX: RGACX (250) vs KLGNX (2500). KLGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. RGACX (6.14). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.89 vs. KLGNX (19.62).
| KLGNX | RGACX | KLGNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.94 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.162 | 16.752 | 91% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 6.14 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.89 | 61.61 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.62 | 34.89 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.33 | 91.51 | 77% |