Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGNX vs RGACX
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGNX vs RGACX
NYLI WMC Growth Investor Class
Price$52.55
Change-$0.91 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.45
Change-$1.34 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGNX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGNX is a Hold and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KLGNX (1.06B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLGNX: RGACX (0.07) vs KLGNX (0.00). KLGNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGNX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). KLGNX (1.41) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). KLGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGNX: RGACX (250) vs KLGNX (2500). KLGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.66 vs. RGACX (6.27). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 31.42 vs. KLGNX (19.33).
| KLGNX | RGACX | KLGNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.93 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.93 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.842 | 20.558 | 67% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.66 | 6.27 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.12 | 67.13 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.33 | 31.42 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.00 | 99.84 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement