Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGEBX
KLCSX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$16.88
Change-$5.48 (-24.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
KLCSX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCSX (1.12B). KLCSX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.88). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: KLCSX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. KLCSX (-11.81). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. KLCSX (-54.07).
| KLCSX | RGEBX | KLCSX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.08 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.08 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.574 | -1.057 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.81 | 1.80 | -657% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.53 | 41.63 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -54.07 | 9.88 | -547% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.55 | 110.02 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement