Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGEBX
KLCSX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$17.10
Change-$0.34 (-1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.68
Change-$1.32 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
KLCSX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KLCSX (1.18B). KLCSX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: KLCSX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.04 vs. KLCSX (-11.16). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.20 vs. KLCSX (-49.81).
| KLCSX | RGEBX | KLCSX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.08 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.08 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.788 | 20.381 | -33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.16 | 6.04 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.09 | 66.16 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.81 | 30.20 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.39 | 95.23 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement