Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGAHX
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$17.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.14
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KLCSX (1.17B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: RGAHX (0.44) vs KLCSX (0.00). KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KLCSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. KLCSX (-10.38). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 23.10 vs. KLCSX (-51.43).
| KLCSX | RGAHX | KLCSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.44 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.44 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.215 | 9.123 | -79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.38 | 5.75 | -180% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.32 | 65.91 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.43 | 23.10 | -223% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.49 | 96.48 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement