Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGAHX
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$19.40
Change-$0.26 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$77.22
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. KLCSX (1.23B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: RGAHX (0.50) vs KLCSX (0.00). KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCSX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KLCSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. KLCSX (-14.73). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.84 vs. KLCSX (-34.99).
| KLCSX | RGAHX | KLCSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.44 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.44 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.688 | 5.147 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.73 | 7.38 | -199% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.67 | 53.85 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.99 | 49.84 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement