Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGAHX
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$21.24
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$84.93
Change+$0.88 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. KLCSX (1.27B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: RGAHX (0.46) vs KLCSX (0.00). KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KLCSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.60 vs. KLCSX (-6.47). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 42.94 vs. KLCSX (-36.97).
| KLCSX | RGAHX | KLCSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.44 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.44 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.522 | 15.918 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.47 | 18.60 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.26 | 60.57 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.97 | 42.94 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement