Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGAHX
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$20.50
Change+$0.28 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
KLCSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. KLCSX (1.25B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: RGAHX (0.47) vs KLCSX (0.00). KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KLCSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. KLCSX (-13.03). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. KLCSX (-34.61).
| KLCSX | RGAHX | KLCSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.44 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.44 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.567 | 11.275 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.03 | 10.98 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.42 | 60.14 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.61 | 50.13 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement