Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGACX
KLCSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGACX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$20.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
KLCSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KLCSX (1.27B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: RGACX (0.07) vs KLCSX (0.00). KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: KLCSX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. KLCSX (-9.42). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. KLCSX (-37.04).
| KLCSX | RGACX | KLCSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.94 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.026 | 14.044 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.42 | 14.08 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.83 | 41.19 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.04 | 41.95 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.38 | 83.68 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement