Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGABX
KLCSX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$20.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
KLCSX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGABX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KLCSX (1.27B). KLCSX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGABX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: KLCSX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. KLCSX (-9.42). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. KLCSX (-37.04).
| KLCSX | RGABX | KLCSX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.39 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.39 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.026 | 13.731 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.42 | 12.81 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.83 | 37.40 | -69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.04 | 36.01 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.38 | 72.15 | 6% |