Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGEBX
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$20.15
Change+$0.28 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$79.23
Change+$0.77 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. KLCIX (1.25B). KLCIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCIX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.94). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. KLCIX (-13.45). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. KLCIX (-35.44).
| KLCIX | RGEBX | KLCIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.09 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.511 | 10.904 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.45 | 10.04 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.30 | 57.17 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.44 | 45.69 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.18 | 78.56 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement