Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGEBX
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$20.50
Change+$0.12 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.73
Change+$0.27 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. KLCIX (1.27B). KLCIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCIX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.94). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. KLCIX (-6.73). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.14 vs. KLCIX (-35.86).
| KLCIX | RGEBX | KLCIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.09 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.413 | 13.004 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.73 | 16.90 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.32 | 55.95 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.86 | 45.14 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.76 | 78.81 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement