Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGEBX
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$19.07
Change-$0.25 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. KLCIX (1.23B). KLCIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCIX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.94). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. KLCIX (-15.13). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. KLCIX (-35.81).
| KLCIX | RGEBX | KLCIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.09 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.641 | 4.829 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.13 | 7.68 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.51 | 51.01 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.81 | 45.42 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.98 | 65.87 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement