Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGAHX
KLCIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$20.50
Change+$0.12 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
KLCIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. KLCIX (1.27B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCIX: RGAHX (0.47) vs KLCIX (0.00). KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCIX (18 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. KLCIX (-6.73). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.57 vs. KLCIX (-35.86).
| KLCIX | RGAHX | KLCIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.44 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.44 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.413 | 13.426 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.73 | 17.89 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.32 | 58.90 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.86 | 49.57 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.76 | N/A | - |