Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGAHX
KLCIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$19.07
Change-$0.25 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$77.22
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
KLCIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. KLCIX (1.23B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCIX: RGAHX (0.50) vs KLCIX (0.00). KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCIX (18 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. KLCIX (-15.13). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.84 vs. KLCIX (-35.81).
| KLCIX | RGAHX | KLCIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.44 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.44 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.641 | 5.147 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.13 | 7.38 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.51 | 53.85 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.81 | 49.84 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement