Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGAGX
KLCIX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGAGX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$20.60
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
KLCIX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KLCIX (1.27B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than KLCIX: RGAGX (0.60) vs KLCIX (0.00). KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: KLCIX (18 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). KLCIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGAGX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. KLCIX (-9.85). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.14 vs. KLCIX (-37.84).
| KLCIX | RGAGX | KLCIX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.30 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.30 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.957 | 14.500 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.85 | 15.11 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.61 | 43.78 | -61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.84 | 46.14 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.69 | 90.14 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement