Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGABX
KLCIX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$20.60
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
KLCIX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGABX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KLCIX (1.27B). KLCIX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGABX: KLCIX (18 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.94). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGABX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. KLCIX (-9.85). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. KLCIX (-37.84).
| KLCIX | RGABX | KLCIX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.39 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.39 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.957 | 13.731 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.85 | 12.81 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.61 | 37.40 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.84 | 36.01 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.69 | 72.15 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement