Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGEBX
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$11.43
Change+$0.15 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$79.23
Change+$0.77 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. KLCCX (1.25B). KLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. KLCCX (-28.34). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. KLCCX (-57.71).
| KLCCX | RGEBX | KLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.09 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.09 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.857 | 10.904 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.34 | 10.04 | -282% |
| Returns for 3 years | -44.27 | 57.17 | -77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.71 | 45.69 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.68 | 78.56 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement