Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGEBX
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$10.83
Change-$0.14 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. KLCCX (1.23B). KLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. KLCCX (-29.72). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. KLCCX (-57.94).
| KLCCX | RGEBX | KLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.09 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.09 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.143 | 4.829 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.72 | 7.68 | -387% |
| Returns for 3 years | -45.08 | 51.01 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.94 | 45.42 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.02 | 65.87 | -64% |