Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGEBX
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$7.21
Change-$5.23 (-42.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCCX (1.09B). KLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). KLCCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. KLCCX (-32.81). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. KLCCX (-76.96).
| KLCCX | RGEBX | KLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.08 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.08 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.637 | -1.057 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -32.81 | 1.80 | -1,824% |
| Returns for 3 years | -55.47 | 41.63 | -133% |
| Returns for 5 years | -76.96 | 9.88 | -779% |
| Returns for 10 years | -52.53 | 110.02 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers