Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGEBX
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$7.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KLCCX (1.17B). KLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. KLCCX (-31.52). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.19 vs. KLCCX (-75.62).
| KLCCX | RGEBX | KLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.08 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.08 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -29.238 | 8.539 | -342% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.52 | 5.34 | -590% |
| Returns for 3 years | -50.50 | 63.50 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -75.62 | 19.19 | -394% |
| Returns for 10 years | -58.05 | 87.00 | -67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement