Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGEBX
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$11.65
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. KLCCX (1.27B). KLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. KLCCX (-22.98). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.84 vs. KLCCX (-58.74).
| KLCCX | RGEBX | KLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.09 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.09 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.762 | 13.088 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.98 | 15.76 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | -47.52 | 46.75 | -102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -58.74 | 42.84 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.94 | 77.60 | -49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement