Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAHX
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$7.21
Change-$5.23 (-42.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCCX (1.09B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAHX (0.43) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. KLCCX (-32.81). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. KLCCX (-76.96).
| KLCCX | RGAHX | KLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.44 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.44 | 448% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.637 | -1.010 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -32.81 | 2.79 | -1,174% |
| Returns for 3 years | -55.47 | 45.40 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -76.96 | 13.96 | -551% |
| Returns for 10 years | -52.53 | 119.50 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement