Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAHX
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$11.43
Change+$0.15 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. KLCCX (1.25B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAHX (0.47) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. KLCCX (-28.34). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. KLCCX (-57.71).
| KLCCX | RGAHX | KLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.44 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.44 | 445% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.857 | 11.275 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.34 | 10.98 | -258% |
| Returns for 3 years | -44.27 | 60.14 | -74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.71 | 50.13 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement