Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAHX
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$7.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KLCCX (1.17B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.91 vs. KLCCX (-31.52). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. KLCCX (-75.62).
| KLCCX | RGAHX | KLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.44 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.44 | 445% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -29.238 | 9.109 | -321% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.52 | 5.91 | -534% |
| Returns for 3 years | -50.50 | 67.08 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -75.62 | 23.08 | -328% |
| Returns for 10 years | -58.05 | 94.58 | -61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement