Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAGX
KLCCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAGX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$87.77
Change+$0.34 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
KLCCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. KLCCX (1.28B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAGX (0.59) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAGX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. KLCCX (-26.02). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.92 vs. KLCCX (-58.06).
| KLCCX | RGAGX | KLCCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.30 | 630% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.30 | 653% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.286 | 17.733 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.02 | 13.24 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | -37.82 | 74.37 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -58.06 | 49.92 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.78 | 118.54 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement