Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGABX
KLCCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$11.79
Change+$0.11 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.49
Change+$0.17 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
KLCCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. KLCCX (1.27B). KLCCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: KLCCX (18 years) vs RGABX (23 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGABX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.53 vs. KLCCX (-22.90). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.12 vs. KLCCX (-59.24).
| KLCCX | RGABX | KLCCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.39 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.39 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.571 | 15.161 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.90 | 16.53 | -139% |
| Returns for 3 years | -43.44 | 54.24 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -59.24 | 34.12 | -174% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.48 | 83.61 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement