Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGEBX
KLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$17.01
Change-$0.23 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
KLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. KLCAX (1.23B). KLCAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCAX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. KLCAX (-17.91). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. KLCAX (-40.86).
| KLCAX | RGEBX | KLCAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.09 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.530 | 4.829 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.91 | 7.68 | -233% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.88 | 51.01 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.86 | 45.42 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.92 | 65.87 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement