Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGAHX
KLCAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$18.28
Change+$0.11 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
KLCAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. KLCAX (1.27B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: RGAHX (0.47) vs KLCAX (0.00). KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCAX (18 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. KLCAX (-9.77). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.57 vs. KLCAX (-40.90).
| KLCAX | RGAHX | KLCAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.44 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.44 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.260 | 13.426 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.77 | 17.89 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.77 | 58.90 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.90 | 49.57 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement