Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGAGX
KLCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGAGX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$18.55
Change+$0.17 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
KLCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. KLCAX (1.27B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: RGAGX (0.59) vs KLCAX (0.00). KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: KLCAX (18 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGAGX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. KLCAX (-9.92). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. KLCAX (-42.65).
| KLCAX | RGAGX | KLCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.30 | 363% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.30 | 397% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.268 | 16.016 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.92 | 18.90 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.64 | 61.40 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.65 | 44.13 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.17 | 102.81 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement