Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGAGX
KLCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGAGX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$18.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
KLCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KLCAX (1.27B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: RGAGX (0.60) vs KLCAX (0.00). KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: KLCAX (18 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGAGX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. KLCAX (-12.77). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.14 vs. KLCAX (-42.72).
| KLCAX | RGAGX | KLCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.30 | 363% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.30 | 397% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.808 | 14.500 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.77 | 15.11 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.56 | 43.78 | -72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.72 | 46.14 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.94 | 90.14 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement