KLAC
Price
$873.34
Change
+$29.44 (+3.49%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
115.24B
47 days until earnings call
MU
Price
$124.20
Change
+$5.48 (+4.62%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
139.01B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KLAC vs MU

Header iconKLAC vs MU Comparison
Open Charts KLAC vs MUBanner chart's image
KLA
Price$873.34
Change+$29.44 (+3.49%)
Volume$10.1K
Capitalization115.24B
Micron Technology
Price$124.20
Change+$5.48 (+4.62%)
Volume$232.44K
Capitalization139.01B
KLAC vs MU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KLAC vs. MU commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLAC is a Buy and MU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (KLAC: $843.90 vs. MU: $118.72)
Brand notoriety: KLAC and MU are both notable
KLAC represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while MU is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLAC: 98% vs. MU: 71%
Market capitalization -- KLAC: $115.24B vs. MU: $139.01B
KLAC [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $115.24B. MU’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $139.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $286.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.18T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $21.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $88.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KLAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KLAC is a better buy in the long-term than MU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KLAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KLAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KLAC is a better buy in the short-term than MU.

Price Growth

KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -5.06% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -3.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

KLAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MU is expected to report earnings on Sep 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.69% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-3.83% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($139B) has a higher market cap than KLAC($115B). KLAC has higher P/E ratio than MU: KLAC (28.76) vs MU (22.38). MU YTD gains are higher at: 41.381 vs. KLAC (34.846). MU has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. KLAC (613M). KLAC has less debt than MU: KLAC (6.09B) vs MU (16.1B).
KLACMUKLAC / MU
Capitalization115B139B83%
EBITDAN/A16.2B-
Gain YTD34.84641.38184%
P/E Ratio28.7622.38128%
RevenueN/A33.8B-
Total Cash613M10.8B6%
Total Debt6.09B16.1B38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLAC vs MU: Fundamental Ratings
KLAC
MU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7777
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1952
SMR RATING
1..100
1360
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5211
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (27) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as KLAC (37) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to KLAC’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MU (52) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MU’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's SMR Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MU (60) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MU’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLAC (52) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLAC’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MU (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLACMU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LINA.X0.0000060.000001
+26.24%
Linear Finance cryptocurrency
QNT.X101.6693900.842308
+0.84%
Quant cryptocurrency
LSK.X0.3718670.000964
+0.26%
Lisk cryptocurrency
CELO.X0.301523-0.000475
-0.16%
Celo cryptocurrency
NKN.X0.026357-0.000084
-0.32%
NKN cryptocurrency

KLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLAC
1D Price
Change %
KLAC100%
-0.29%
LRCX - KLAC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
AMAT - KLAC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
ASML - KLAC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
ADI - KLAC
78%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
NXPI - KLAC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
More

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
+0.20%
LRCX - MU
80%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
AMAT - MU
72%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
VECO - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
KLIC - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
KLAC - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
More