KIND vs SEAT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KIND is a Hold and SEAT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KIND’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- KIND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KIND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KIND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SEAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
KIND (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -14.08% price change this week, while SEAT (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -4.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
KIND is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
SEAT is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-0.12% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| KIND | SEAT | KIND / SEAT | |
| Capitalization | 886M | 802M | 110% |
| EBITDA | -166.52M | 102M | -163% |
| Gain YTD | 29.101 | -43.671 | -67% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 23.13 | - |
| Revenue | 218M | 713M | 31% |
| Total Cash | 531M | 125M | 425% |
| Total Debt | 66.6M | 285M | 23% |
| KIND | SEAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 0% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 58% |
KIND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIND has been loosely correlated with ZG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KIND jumps, then ZG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KIND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIND | 100% | -2.01% | ||
| ZG - KIND | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| GETY - KIND | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| GENI - KIND | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
| Z - KIND | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| PINS - KIND | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||
SEAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEAT has been loosely correlated with MTCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEAT jumps, then MTCH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEAT | 100% | -5.32% | ||
| MTCH - SEAT | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| FVRR - SEAT | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.32% | ||
| TTGT - SEAT | 28% Poorly correlated | -9.32% | ||
| EVER - SEAT | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
| KIND - SEAT | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
More | ||||