KIM
Price
$20.43
Change
-$0.16 (-0.78%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
13.84B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
REG
Price
$69.82
Change
-$0.18 (-0.26%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
12.77B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KIM vs REG

Header iconKIM vs REG Comparison
Open Charts KIM vs REGBanner chart's image
Kimco Realty
Price$20.43
Change-$0.16 (-0.78%)
Volume$3.2M
Capitalization13.84B
Regency Centers
Price$69.82
Change-$0.18 (-0.26%)
Volume$963.35K
Capitalization12.77B
KIM vs REG Comparison Chart in %
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KIM vs. REG commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KIM is a Hold and REG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (KIM: $20.43 vs. REG: $69.82)
Brand notoriety: KIM and REG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KIM: 71% vs. REG: 87%
Market capitalization -- KIM: $13.84B vs. REG: $12.77B
KIM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $13.84B. REG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $12.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KIM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileREG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • REG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KIM and REG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KIM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • REG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, REG is a better buy in the short-term than KIM.

Price Growth

KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.94% price change this week, while REG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

KIM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

REG is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.37% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($13.8B) has a higher market cap than REG($12.8B). REG has higher P/E ratio than KIM: REG (32.03) vs KIM (24.61). REG YTD gains are higher at: -2.512 vs. KIM (-9.714). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. REG (1B). REG has less debt than KIM: REG (5.41B) vs KIM (8.28B). KIM has higher revenues than REG: KIM (2.1B) vs REG (1.5B).
KIMREGKIM / REG
Capitalization13.8B12.8B108%
EBITDA1.41B1B140%
Gain YTD-9.714-2.512387%
P/E Ratio24.6132.0377%
Revenue2.1B1.5B140%
Total Cash227MN/A-
Total Debt8.28B5.41B153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KIM vs REG: Fundamental Ratings
KIM
REG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4923
SMR RATING
1..100
8381
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9152
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KIM's Valuation (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (84). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

REG's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (49). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

REG's SMR Rating (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (83). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

REG's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (60). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

REG's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIM (91). This means that REG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KIMREG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PATN27.580.22
+0.80%
PACER FDS TR
SPGM77.250.15
+0.19%
SPDR® Portfolio MSCI Global Stk Mkt ETF
BSMR23.670.03
+0.13%
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Muncpl Bd ETF
DYYXF2.69N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)
KTEC17.56-0.11
-0.62%
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH ETF

REG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REG has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REG jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REG
1D Price
Change %
REG100%
-1.77%
FRT - REG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
KIM - REG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
KRG - REG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
BRX - REG
79%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
UE - REG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
More