KIM
Price
$20.41
Change
+$0.11 (+0.54%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.82B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PW
Price
$0.93
Change
+$0.03 (+3.33%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.15M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KIM vs PW

Header iconKIM vs PW Comparison
Open Charts KIM vs PWBanner chart's image
Kimco Realty
Price$20.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.54%)
Volume$3.91M
Capitalization13.82B
Power REIT
Price$0.93
Change+$0.03 (+3.33%)
Volume$164.71K
Capitalization3.15M
KIM vs PW Comparison Chart in %
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KIM vs. PW commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KIM is a StrongBuy and PW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (KIM: $20.31 vs. PW: $0.93)
Brand notoriety: KIM and PW are both not notable
KIM represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while PW is part of the Specialty Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KIM: 19% vs. PW: 17%
Market capitalization -- KIM: $13.82B vs. PW: $3.15M
KIM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $13.82B. PW’s [@Specialty Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $82.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $14.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KIM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KIM is a better buy in the long-term than PW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KIM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PW is a better buy in the short-term than KIM.

Price Growth

KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.81% price change this week, while PW (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +11.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.16%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

KIM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

PW is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.05% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Specialty Telecommunications (-0.62% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($13.8B) has a higher market cap than PW($3.15M). KIM YTD gains are higher at: -10.267 vs. PW (-30.075). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. PW (-904.56K). KIM has more cash in the bank: 227M vs. PW (1.48M). PW has less debt than KIM: PW (20.4M) vs KIM (8.28B). KIM has higher revenues than PW: KIM (2.1B) vs PW (2.99M).
KIMPWKIM / PW
Capitalization13.8B3.15M437,817%
EBITDA1.41B-904.56K-155,434%
Gain YTD-10.267-30.07534%
P/E Ratio24.59N/A-
Revenue2.1B2.99M70,114%
Total Cash227M1.48M15,327%
Total Debt8.28B20.4M40,593%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KIM vs PW: Fundamental Ratings
KIM
PW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47100
SMR RATING
1..100
83100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KIM's Valuation (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PW (77). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to PW’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PW (100). This means that KIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PW’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's SMR Rating (83) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PW (100). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to PW’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PW (61). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to PW’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PW (99). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to PW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KIMPW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVIG42.040.04
+0.11%
Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF
MSTI20.66N/A
N/A
Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF
USRD32.97N/A
N/A
Themes US R&D Champions ETF
UUP28.18-0.01
-0.05%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bullish
NBET33.11-0.37
-1.11%
Neuberger Berman Engy Trnstn & InfrasETF

KIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with KRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then KRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIM
1D Price
Change %
KIM100%
-0.90%
KRG - KIM
87%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
FRT - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
BRX - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
AKR - KIM
83%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
IVT - KIM
80%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
More

PW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PW and AI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PW and AI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PW
1D Price
Change %
PW100%
+12.05%
AI - PW
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
LAMR - PW
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
MAC - PW
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
KIM - PW
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
EQIX - PW
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
More