KIM
Price
$21.84
Change
+$0.23 (+1.06%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
14.79B
12 days until earnings call
PW
Price
$0.82
Change
-$0.08 (-8.89%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.78M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KIM vs PW

Header iconKIM vs PW Comparison
Open Charts KIM vs PWBanner chart's image
Kimco Realty
Price$21.84
Change+$0.23 (+1.06%)
Volume$3.99M
Capitalization14.79B
Power REIT
Price$0.82
Change-$0.08 (-8.89%)
Volume$69.86K
Capitalization2.78M
KIM vs PW Comparison Chart in %
KIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KIM vs. PW commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KIM is a Hold and PW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (KIM: $21.84 vs. PW: $0.82)
Brand notoriety: KIM and PW are both not notable
KIM represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while PW is part of the Specialty Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KIM: 104% vs. PW: 39%
Market capitalization -- KIM: $14.79B vs. PW: $2.78M
KIM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $14.79B. PW’s [@Specialty Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $89.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.15B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $16.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KIM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KIM is a better buy in the long-term than PW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KIM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KIM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KIM is a better buy in the short-term than PW.

Price Growth

KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +5.10% price change this week, while PW (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -11.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

KIM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

PW is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.70% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Specialty Telecommunications (-0.20% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($14.8B) has a higher market cap than PW($2.78M). KIM YTD gains are higher at: -3.483 vs. PW (-38.316). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. PW (-904.56K). KIM has more cash in the bank: 227M vs. PW (1.48M). PW has less debt than KIM: PW (20.4M) vs KIM (8.28B). KIM has higher revenues than PW: KIM (2.1B) vs PW (2.99M).
KIMPWKIM / PW
Capitalization14.8B2.78M532,183%
EBITDA1.41B-904.56K-155,434%
Gain YTD-3.483-38.3169%
P/E Ratio26.63N/A-
Revenue2.1B2.99M70,114%
Total Cash227M1.48M15,327%
Total Debt8.28B20.4M40,593%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KIM vs PW: Fundamental Ratings
KIM
PW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5988
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4395
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
711

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KIM's Valuation (65) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PW (74). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to PW’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PW (100). This means that KIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PW’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's SMR Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PW (100). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to PW’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PW (95). This means that KIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PW’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PW (100). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to PW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KIMPW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTBP0.690.01
+1.38%
GT Biopharma
TSLX21.500.22
+1.03%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
PNW93.150.15
+0.16%
Pinnacle West Capital Corp
CATO3.89N/A
N/A
CATO Corp
GDEV22.26-0.92
-3.99%
GDEV Inc

KIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with BRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then BRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIM
1D Price
Change %
KIM100%
+1.06%
BRX - KIM
88%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
FRT - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
KRG - KIM
85%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
AKR - KIM
83%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
REG - KIM
81%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

PW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PW and AI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PW and AI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PW
1D Price
Change %
PW100%
-8.83%
AI - PW
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
LAMR - PW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
MAC - PW
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
KIM - PW
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
EQIX - PW
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More