Advertisement
KIM vs LTC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KIM is a Hold and LTC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KIM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KIM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.62% price change this week, while LTC (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +0.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.28%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
KIM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
LTC is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.69% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+0.43% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| KIM | LTC | KIM / LTC | |
| Capitalization | 14B | 1.71B | 821% |
| EBITDA | 1.42B | 109M | 1,306% |
| Gain YTD | 1.825 | 4.218 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.87 | 49.76 | 50% |
| Revenue | 2.12B | 231M | 919% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 8.35B | 945M | 883% |
KIM | LTC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LTC's Valuation (16) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIM (59). This means that LTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIM’s over the last 12 months.
KIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LTC (59). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to LTC’s over the last 12 months.
KIM's SMR Rating (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LTC (87). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to LTC’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (58). This means that LTC’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for KIM (90). This means that LTC’s stock grew significantly faster than KIM’s over the last 12 months.
| KIM | LTC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 60% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 53% | 7 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KBWP | 122.61 | 0.68 | +0.56% |
| Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Ins ETF | |||
| GJT | 22.90 | N/A | N/A |
| Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS 2006-3 AllState Corp | |||
| BFRE | 30.33 | N/A | N/A |
| Westwood LBRTY Global Equity ETF | |||
| IGTR | 28.64 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Innovator Gradient Tactical Rot Str ETF | |||
| NFJ | 13.28 | -0.02 | -0.15% |
| Virtus Dividend Interest & Premium Strategy Fund | |||
KIM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
LTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTC has been closely correlated with NHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LTC jumps, then NHI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTC | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| NHI - LTC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| SBRA - LTC | 68% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| OHI - LTC | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| CTRE - LTC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| KIM - LTC | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||