Advertisement
KIM vs LAMR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KIM is a Hold and LAMR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KIM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLAMR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LAMR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KIM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LAMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.14% price change this week, while LAMR (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -2.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
KIM is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
LAMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.35% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Specialty Telecommunications (+0.31% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| KIM | LAMR | KIM / LAMR | |
| Capitalization | 14.3B | 12.3B | 116% |
| EBITDA | 1.41B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.514 | 2.317 | -324% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.80 | 28.26 | 91% |
| Revenue | 2.1B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 227M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 8.28B | 1.36B | 608% |
KIM | LAMR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LAMR's Valuation (39) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (63). This means that LAMR’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.
LAMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (47). This means that LAMR’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.
LAMR's SMR Rating (27) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIM (84). This means that LAMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIM’s over the last 12 months.
KIM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LAMR (57). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to LAMR’s over the last 12 months.
LAMR's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIM (91). This means that LAMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIM’s over the last 12 months.
| KIM | LAMR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 40% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UBRL | 31.46 | 0.45 | +1.45% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF | |||
| GSFP | 33.78 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF | |||
| RWR | 95.99 | -0.76 | -0.79% |
| SPDR® Dow Jones® REIT ETF | |||
| MID | 66.59 | -0.79 | -1.18% |
| American Century Mid Cap Gr Impact ETF | |||
| CSMD | 32.34 | -0.40 | -1.22% |
| Congress SMid Growth ETF | |||
KIM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
LAMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAMR has been closely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAMR jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LAMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAMR | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| OUT - LAMR | 80% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| AKR - LAMR | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| KIM - LAMR | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| FRT - LAMR | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| UE - LAMR | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||