Advertisement
KHDHF vs TMTNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KHDHF is a Buy and TMTNF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KHDHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMTNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KHDHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TMTNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KHDHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMTNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KHDHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TMTNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
KHDHF (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TMTNF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was +0.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.05%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics Distributors (+0.78% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
| KHDHF | TMTNF | KHDHF / TMTNF | |
| Capitalization | 118M | 8.53B | 1% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 947M | - |
| Gain YTD | 61.765 | 31.163 | 198% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.29 | 24.27 | 26% |
| Revenue | N/A | 5.11B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.03B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 991M | - |
KHDHF | TMTNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KHDHF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMTNF (52). This means that KHDHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMTNF’s over the last 12 months.
TMTNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KHDHF (67). This means that TMTNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KHDHF’s over the last 12 months.
TMTNF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KHDHF (92). This means that TMTNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KHDHF’s over the last 12 months.
KHDHF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TMTNF (49). This means that KHDHF’s stock grew similarly to TMTNF’s over the last 12 months.
TMTNF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KHDHF (100). This means that TMTNF’s stock grew significantly faster than KHDHF’s over the last 12 months.
| KHDHF | TMTNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 28% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 30% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 37% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 45% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SEMI | 29.29 | 0.33 | +1.13% |
| Columbia Select Technology ETF | |||
| JGLO | 66.53 | 0.46 | +0.70% |
| JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF | |||
| VTN | 10.14 | 0.05 | +0.50% |
| Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals | |||
| HMOP | 38.38 | 0.09 | +0.24% |
| Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | |||
| TVE | 23.50 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029 | |||
KHDHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KHDHF and IVCHF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KHDHF and IVCHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KHDHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KHDHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IVCHF - KHDHF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FINGF - KHDHF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| TMTNF - KHDHF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IDDWF - KHDHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GROUF - KHDHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TMTNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TMTNF and WJXFF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMTNF and WJXFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMTNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMTNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WJXFF - TMTNF | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
| FINGF - TMTNF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CWXZF - TMTNF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| KHDHF - TMTNF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EENEF - TMTNF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||