KGTFF
Price
$0.90
Change
-$0.03 (-3.23%)
Updated
Jan 2 closing price
Capitalization
12.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBIN
Price
$35.64
Change
+$0.42 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.61B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGTFF vs MBIN

Header iconKGTFF vs MBIN Comparison
Open Charts KGTFF vs MBINBanner chart's image
Krung Thai Bank Public
Price$0.90
Change-$0.03 (-3.23%)
Volume$282
Capitalization12.74B
Merchants Ban
Price$35.64
Change+$0.42 (+1.19%)
Volume$457
Capitalization1.61B
KGTFF vs MBIN Comparison Chart in %
KGTFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGTFF vs. MBIN commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGTFF is a Hold and MBIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (KGTFF: $0.90 vs. MBIN: $35.22)
Brand notoriety: KGTFF and MBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGTFF: 9% vs. MBIN: 68%
Market capitalization -- KGTFF: $12.74B vs. MBIN: $1.61B
KGTFF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.74B. MBIN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGTFF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMBIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • KGTFF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MBIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGTFF is a better buy in the long-term than MBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGTFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGTFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MBIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGTFF is a better buy in the short-term than MBIN.

Price Growth

KGTFF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MBIN (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGTFF($12.7B) has a higher market cap than MBIN($1.62B). KGTFF has higher P/E ratio than MBIN: KGTFF (8.60) vs MBIN (8.09). MBIN YTD gains are higher at: 3.406 vs. KGTFF (-3.550). MBIN has less debt than KGTFF: MBIN (2.9B) vs KGTFF (408B). KGTFF has higher revenues than MBIN: KGTFF (158B) vs MBIN (686M).
KGTFFMBINKGTFF / MBIN
Capitalization12.7B1.62B786%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.5503.406-104%
P/E Ratio8.608.09106%
Revenue158B686M23,032%
Total CashN/A11.6M-
Total Debt408B2.9B14,054%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGTFF vs MBIN: Fundamental Ratings
KGTFF
MBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9912
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1755
SMR RATING
1..100
116
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1721
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBIN's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KGTFF (26) in the null industry. This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to KGTFF’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBIN (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KGTFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MBIN (16) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KGTFF’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MBIN (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KGTFF’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

KGTFF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MBIN (21) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KGTFF’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGTFFMBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGTFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGJQX17.840.09
+0.51%
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure R6
NWHMX11.900.05
+0.42%
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs R6
PGPCX26.82-0.07
-0.26%
George Putnam Balanced C
SDYYX16.67-0.09
-0.54%
SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation Y (SIMT)
MSJFX63.35-0.45
-0.71%
Invesco Main Street R5

KGTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGTFF and INBC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGTFF and INBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGTFF
1D Price
Change %
KGTFF100%
N/A
INBC - KGTFF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBIN - KGTFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
LOGN - KGTFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
KPCPF - KGTFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKKPF - KGTFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBIN has been closely correlated with CNOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBIN jumps, then CNOB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBIN
1D Price
Change %
MBIN100%
+1.82%
CNOB - MBIN
73%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
OSBC - MBIN
72%
Closely correlated
+2.97%
SRCE - MBIN
72%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
ASB - MBIN
72%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
CWBC - MBIN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More