Advertisement
KGSPF vs RLLWF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGSPF is a Hold and RLLWF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KGSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRLLWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- KGSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RLLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KGSPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RLLWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KGSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RLLWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KGSPF (@Building Products) experienced а +5.18% price change this week, while RLLWF (@Building Products) price change was +7.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.55%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (+2.76% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| KGSPF | RLLWF | KGSPF / RLLWF | |
| Capitalization | 14.4B | 2.07B | 696% |
| EBITDA | 1.22B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.603 | -13.810 | 33% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.72 | 16.72 | 112% |
| Revenue | 8.96B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 581M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.72B | N/A | - |
KGSPF | RLLWF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RLLWF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGSPF (62). This means that RLLWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGSPF’s over the last 12 months.
KGSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as RLLWF (82). This means that KGSPF’s stock grew similarly to RLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
KGSPF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as RLLWF (79). This means that KGSPF’s stock grew similarly to RLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
RLLWF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as KGSPF (82). This means that RLLWF’s stock grew similarly to KGSPF’s over the last 12 months.
KGSPF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as RLLWF (87). This means that KGSPF’s stock grew similarly to RLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
| KGSPF | RLLWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 35% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
KGSPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KGSPF and RLLWF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGSPF and RLLWF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KGSPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGSPF | 100% | +7.13% | ||
| RLLWF - KGSPF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KGSPY - KGSPF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| NPSGF - KGSPF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MCCK - KGSPF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TOTDF - KGSPF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RLLWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RLLWF and NDRBF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLLWF and NDRBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RLLWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLLWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NDRBF - RLLWF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KGSPF - RLLWF | 10% Poorly correlated | +7.13% | ||
| JSGRY - RLLWF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TOTDY - RLLWF | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.73% | ||
| NPSGF - RLLWF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||