KGSPF
Price
$85.00
Change
-$2.85 (-3.24%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
14.64B
MCCK
Price
$41.75
Change
-$1.75 (-4.02%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
158.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGSPF vs MCCK

Header iconKGSPF vs MCCK Comparison
Open Charts KGSPF vs MCCKBanner chart's image
Kingspan Group
Price$85.00
Change-$2.85 (-3.24%)
Volume$382
Capitalization14.64B
Mestek
Price$41.75
Change-$1.75 (-4.02%)
Volume$239
Capitalization158.99M
KGSPF vs MCCK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCCK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGSPF vs. MCCK commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGSPF is a Hold and MCCK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (KGSPF: $85.00 vs. MCCK: $41.75)
Brand notoriety: KGSPF and MCCK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGSPF: 78% vs. MCCK: 38%
Market capitalization -- KGSPF: $14.64B vs. MCCK: $158.99M
KGSPF [@Building Products] is valued at $14.64B. MCCK’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $158.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCCK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • KGSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCCK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCCK is a better buy in the long-term than KGSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGSPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCCK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCCK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KGSPF and MCCK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KGSPF (@Building Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCCK (@Building Products) price change was -0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.44%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+1.49% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGSPF($14.6B) has a higher market cap than MCCK($159M). KGSPF has higher P/E ratio than MCCK: KGSPF (17.54) vs MCCK (14.58). MCCK YTD gains are higher at: 26.515 vs. KGSPF (-0.188). KGSPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 984M vs. MCCK (22.8M). KGSPF has more cash in the bank: 649M vs. MCCK (58.1M). MCCK has less debt than KGSPF: MCCK (10.2M) vs KGSPF (2.39B). KGSPF has higher revenues than MCCK: KGSPF (8.34B) vs MCCK (351M).
KGSPFMCCKKGSPF / MCCK
Capitalization14.6B159M9,182%
EBITDA984M22.8M4,316%
Gain YTD-0.18826.515-1%
P/E Ratio17.5414.58120%
Revenue8.34B351M2,376%
Total Cash649M58.1M1,117%
Total Debt2.39B10.2M23,392%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGSPF vs MCCK: Fundamental Ratings
KGSPF
MCCK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6232
SMR RATING
1..100
817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
798
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCCK's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as KGSPF (65). This means that MCCK’s stock grew similarly to KGSPF’s over the last 12 months.

MCCK's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as KGSPF (62). This means that MCCK’s stock grew similarly to KGSPF’s over the last 12 months.

MCCK's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KGSPF (81). This means that MCCK’s stock grew significantly faster than KGSPF’s over the last 12 months.

MCCK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGSPF (74). This means that MCCK’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGSPF’s over the last 12 months.

MCCK's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KGSPF (79). This means that MCCK’s stock grew significantly faster than KGSPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGSPFMCCK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCCK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CELC12.540.53
+4.41%
Celcuity
FUN30.890.64
+2.12%
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
SBS20.970.11
+0.53%
Companhia DE Saneamento B Sico DO Estado DE SAO Paulo-Sabesp Ads's
OPRT7.36-0.09
-1.21%
Oportun Financial Corp
DATS2.47-0.19
-7.14%
DatChat

KGSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGSPF and RLLWF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGSPF and RLLWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGSPF
1D Price
Change %
KGSPF100%
N/A
RLLWF - KGSPF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGSPY - KGSPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
NPSGF - KGSPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCCK - KGSPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOTDF - KGSPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCCK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCCK and TOTDY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCCK and TOTDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCCK
1D Price
Change %
MCCK100%
N/A
TOTDY - MCCK
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
KGSPY - MCCK
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
TOTDF - MCCK
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPSGF - MCCK
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKWBF - MCCK
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More