Advertisement
KGFHY vs RUSHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGFHY is a Buy and RUSHA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KGFHY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KGFHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KGFHY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KGFHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KGFHY (@Home Improvement Chains) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +3.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.10%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
KGFHY is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2026.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Home Improvement Chains (+0.94% weekly)The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.
@Automotive Aftermarket (-1.98% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| KGFHY | RUSHA | KGFHY / RUSHA | |
| Capitalization | 8.09B | 5.5B | 147% |
| EBITDA | 1.13B | 664M | 170% |
| Gain YTD | 16.048 | 35.206 | 46% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.73 | 21.65 | 156% |
| Revenue | 12.8B | 7.67B | 167% |
| Total Cash | 640M | 242M | 264% |
| Total Debt | 2.37B | 1.52B | 156% |
KGFHY | RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 41 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KGFHY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as RUSHA (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that KGFHY’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGFHY (57) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGFHY’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's SMR Rating (60) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGFHY (93) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGFHY’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as KGFHY (41) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to KGFHY’s over the last 12 months.
KGFHY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as RUSHA (22) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that KGFHY’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
| KGFHY | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 65% |
Advertisement
KGFHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGFHY has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KGFHY jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KGFHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGFHY | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| PAG - KGFHY | 45% Loosely correlated | +5.36% | ||
| CWH - KGFHY | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| ABG - KGFHY | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| DUFRY - KGFHY | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| RUSHA - KGFHY | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | +1.91% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 82% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| LAD - RUSHA | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| ONEW - RUSHA | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| HVT - RUSHA | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| HZO - RUSHA | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
More | ||||