KGC
Price
$18.98
Change
+$0.21 (+1.12%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
23.18B
85 days until earnings call
LUGDF
Price
$57.27
Change
+$3.46 (+6.43%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
13.86B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGC vs LUGDF

Header iconKGC vs LUGDF Comparison
Open Charts KGC vs LUGDFBanner chart's image
Kinross Gold
Price$18.98
Change+$0.21 (+1.12%)
Volume$17.51M
Capitalization23.18B
Lundin Gold
Price$57.27
Change+$3.46 (+6.43%)
Volume$27.3K
Capitalization13.86B
KGC vs LUGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGC vs. LUGDF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGC is a StrongBuy and LUGDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (KGC: $18.98 vs. LUGDF: $57.27)
Brand notoriety: KGC: Notable vs. LUGDF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGC: 93% vs. LUGDF: 56%
Market capitalization -- KGC: $23.18B vs. LUGDF: $13.86B
KGC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $23.18B. LUGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLUGDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than KGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUGDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the short-term than LUGDF.

Price Growth

KGC (@Precious Metals) experienced а +17.09% price change this week, while LUGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +21.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.59% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($23.2B) has a higher market cap than LUGDF($13.9B). LUGDF has higher P/E ratio than KGC: LUGDF (25.80) vs KGC (15.31). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 176.574 vs. KGC (105.717). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.48B vs. LUGDF (1.15B). KGC has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. LUGDF (452M). LUGDF has less debt than KGC: LUGDF (298M) vs KGC (1.24B). KGC has higher revenues than LUGDF: KGC (6.07B) vs LUGDF (1.32B).
KGCLUGDFKGC / LUGDF
Capitalization23.2B13.9B167%
EBITDA3.48B1.15B302%
Gain YTD105.717176.57460%
P/E Ratio15.3125.8059%
Revenue6.07B1.32B459%
Total Cash1.14B452M251%
Total Debt1.24B298M415%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGC vs LUGDF: Fundamental Ratings
KGC
LUGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
506
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
212
SMR RATING
1..100
4220
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8435
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as KGC (19) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as KGC (21) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as KGC (42) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as KGC (37) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGC (84) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGCLUGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQH53.550.32
+0.59%
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hdg Eq Inc ETF
NBDS34.540.17
+0.49%
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
RAAX32.020.03
+0.10%
VanEck Real Assets ETF
ISTB48.57-0.04
-0.08%
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
DMBS49.03-0.10
-0.20%
DoubleLine Mortgage ETF

KGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGC has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGC jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGC
1D Price
Change %
KGC100%
+1.12%
AEM - KGC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
WPM - KGC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
AGI - KGC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
OR - KGC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
AU - KGC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
More

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+6.43%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
WPM - LUGDF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More