KGAUF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
238.15M
QS
Price
$8.68
Change
-$0.60 (-6.47%)
Updated
Jul 30, 04:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.04B
84 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGAUF vs QS

Header iconKGAUF vs QS Comparison
Open Charts KGAUF vs QSBanner chart's image
Kongsberg Automotive ASA
Price$0.13
Change-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Volume$21.5K
Capitalization238.15M
QuantumScape
Price$8.68
Change-$0.60 (-6.47%)
Volume$64.41K
Capitalization3.04B
KGAUF vs QS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGAUF vs. QS commentary
Jul 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGAUF is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 30, 2025
Stock price -- (KGAUF: $0.13 vs. QS: $9.28)
Brand notoriety: KGAUF and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGAUF: 401% vs. QS: 150%
Market capitalization -- KGAUF: $238.15M vs. QS: $3.04B
KGAUF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $238.15M. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the long-term than KGAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGAUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGAUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than KGAUF.

Price Growth

KGAUF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -32.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-3.00% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.04B) has a higher market cap than KGAUF($238M). QS YTD gains are higher at: 78.805 vs. KGAUF (15.344). KGAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 81.9M vs. QS (-392.95M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. KGAUF (179M). QS has less debt than KGAUF: QS (101M) vs KGAUF (264M). KGAUF has higher revenues than QS: KGAUF (916M) vs QS (0).
KGAUFQSKGAUF / QS
Capitalization238M3.04B8%
EBITDA81.9M-392.95M-21%
Gain YTD15.34478.80519%
P/E Ratio10.00N/A-
Revenue916M0-
Total Cash179M1.07B17%
Total Debt264M101M261%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGAUF: Fundamental Ratings
KGAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGAUFQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHSRX22.520.02
+0.09%
Hartford Small Company R3
WHGLX14.06N/A
N/A
Westwood Quality Value Fund Inst
ACEMX11.03-0.01
-0.09%
Alger Emerging Markets C
VADCX71.19-0.08
-0.11%
Invesco Equally-Wtd S&P 500 C
DREQX21.47-0.07
-0.32%
BNY Mellon Research Growth Z

KGAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGAUF and ASEKF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGAUF and ASEKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGAUF
1D Price
Change %
KGAUF100%
N/A
ASEKF - KGAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QS - KGAUF
5%
Poorly correlated
-15.48%
NKRKF - KGAUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLLY - KGAUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
NHKGF - KGAUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More