KFS
Price
$13.55
Change
+$0.03 (+0.22%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
392.39M
PAG
Price
$176.07
Change
+$1.24 (+0.71%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.63B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KFS vs PAG

Header iconKFS vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts KFS vs PAGBanner chart's image
Kingsway Financial Services
Price$13.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
Volume$300
Capitalization392.39M
Penske Automotive Group
Price$176.07
Change+$1.24 (+0.71%)
Volume$918
Capitalization11.63B
KFS vs PAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KFS vs. PAG commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KFS is a Buy and PAG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (KFS: $13.52 vs. PAG: $174.83)
Brand notoriety: KFS and PAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KFS: 65% vs. PAG: 49%
Market capitalization -- KFS: $392.39M vs. PAG: $11.63B
KFS [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $392.39M. PAG’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $11.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $47.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than KFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the short-term than KFS.

Price Growth

KFS (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -3.29% price change this week, while PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +3.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.44% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($11.6B) has a higher market cap than KFS($392M). PAG has higher P/E ratio than KFS: PAG (12.25) vs KFS (9.65). KFS YTD gains are higher at: 61.529 vs. PAG (16.454). PAG has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. KFS (13.8M). KFS has less debt than PAG: KFS (62.4M) vs PAG (8.41B). PAG has higher revenues than KFS: PAG (30.6B) vs KFS (115M).
KFSPAGKFS / PAG
Capitalization392M11.6B3%
EBITDAN/A1.73B-
Gain YTD61.52916.454374%
P/E Ratio9.6512.2579%
Revenue115M30.6B0%
Total Cash13.8M155M9%
Total Debt62.4M8.41B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KFS vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
KFS
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
105
SMR RATING
1..100
9849
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2748
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (29) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KFS (67) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KFS’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as KFS (10) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to KFS’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KFS (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KFS’s over the last 12 months.

KFS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PAG (52) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KFS’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

KFS's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PAG (48) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KFS’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KFSPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFFL8.630.05
+0.58%
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Lvrgd Pref Stk ETN
LCLG58.730.33
+0.56%
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Gr ETF
BEEX24.330.12
+0.49%
BeeHive ETF
SPBO29.17-0.07
-0.24%
SPDR® Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF
CDX23.17-0.05
-0.24%
Simplify High Yield ETF

KFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KFS and RUSHA have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KFS and RUSHA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KFS
1D Price
Change %
KFS100%
-2.73%
RUSHA - KFS
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
RUSHB - KFS
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
PAG - KFS
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
TTSH - KFS
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
ONEW - KFS
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.24%
More

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-0.15%
AN - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
GPI - PAG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
ABG - PAG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
LAD - PAG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
SAH - PAG
69%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
More