Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEAT vs SCD
KEAT vs SCD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KEAT vs. SCD commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KEAT is a Hold and SCD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCD has more net assets: 376M vs. KEAT (101M). KEAT has a higher annual dividend yield than SCD: KEAT (18.840) vs SCD (-6.133). KEAT was incepted earlier than SCD: KEAT (2 years) vs SCD (22 years). KEAT (0.85) has a lower expense ratio than SCD (1.33). SCD has a higher turnover KEAT (4.00) vs KEAT (4.00).
| KEAT | SCD | KEAT / SCD | |
| Gain YTD | 18.840 | -6.133 | -307% |
| Net Assets | 101M | 376M | 27% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.33 | 64% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 44.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 2.20 | 2.55 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KEAT | SCD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 26 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KEAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEAT has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KEAT jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEAT | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| SHEL - KEAT | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| SU - KEAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| TTE - KEAT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| SLB - KEAT | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| OII - KEAT | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
More | ||||
SCD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCD and BX have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCD and BX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCD | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| BX - SCD | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| AAPL - SCD | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| ET - SCD | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
| OKE - SCD | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.29% | ||
| MSFT - SCD | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||