KDKGF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
27.92M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KGLDF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
17.07M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KDKGF vs KGLDF

Header iconKDKGF vs KGLDF Comparison
Open Charts KDKGF vs KGLDFBanner chart's image
Klondike Gold
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$155.5K
Capitalization27.92M
King Global Ventures
Price$0.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization17.07M
KDKGF vs KGLDF Comparison Chart in %
KDKGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGLDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KDKGF vs. KGLDF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KDKGF is a Buy and KGLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (KDKGF: $0.11 vs. KGLDF: $0.41)
Brand notoriety: KDKGF and KGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KDKGF: 91% vs. KGLDF: 5%
Market capitalization -- KDKGF: $27.92M vs. KGLDF: $17.07M
KDKGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $27.92M. KGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $17.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $148.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KDKGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGLDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KDKGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KDKGF is a better buy in the long-term than KGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KDKGF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGLDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KDKGF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KDKGF is a better buy in the short-term than KGLDF.

Price Growth

KDKGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -13.99% price change this week, while KGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +93.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KDKGF($27.9M) has a higher market cap than KGLDF($17.1M). KDKGF YTD gains are higher at: 57.446 vs. KGLDF (-1.238). KDKGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -903.42K vs. KGLDF (-3.35M). KGLDF has more cash in the bank: 3.56M vs. KDKGF (953K). KDKGF has less debt than KGLDF: KDKGF (41.1K) vs KGLDF (178K). KDKGF (0) and KGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KDKGFKGLDFKDKGF / KGLDF
Capitalization27.9M17.1M163%
EBITDA-903.42K-3.35M27%
Gain YTD57.446-1.238-4,640%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash953K3.56M27%
Total Debt41.1K178K23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KDKGF vs KGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
KDKGF
KGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
267
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3685

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KDKGF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (47). This means that KDKGF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KDKGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (100). This means that KDKGF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KDKGF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (97). This means that KDKGF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KDKGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (60). This means that KDKGF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KDKGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (100). This means that KDKGF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KDKGFKGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KDKGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGLDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKFRY27.200.37
+1.38%
AB SKF
OSTIY19.25N/A
N/A
Osterreichische Post AG
HSTI1.40N/A
N/A
High Sierra Technologies Inc.
BPOPO25.00N/A
N/A
Popular, Inc.
SRBIF3.85-0.16
-3.87%
Serabi Gold Plc

KDKGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KDKGF and APRAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KDKGF and APRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KDKGF
1D Price
Change %
KDKGF100%
-8.69%
APRAF - KDKGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
EGMCF - KDKGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
JAGGF - KDKGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
KGLDF - KDKGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
KNTNF - KDKGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
More

KGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGLDF and NIOVF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGLDF and NIOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGLDF
1D Price
Change %
KGLDF100%
+1.92%
NIOVF - KGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAGGF - KGLDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
KNTNF - KGLDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
KDKGF - KGLDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-8.69%
JGLDF - KGLDF
-7%
Poorly correlated
+3.42%