Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs RWMFX
KCXIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs RWMFX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Idx I
Price$20.66
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.65M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
KCXIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. KCXIX (305M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than KCXIX: RWMFX (1.45) vs KCXIX (0.90). KCXIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: KCXIX (6 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). KCXIX (0.43) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. KCXIX (13.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCXIX: RWMFX (250) vs KCXIX (25000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.39 vs. RWMFX (5.51). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 74.99 vs. RWMFX (37.79).
| KCXIX | RWMFX | KCXIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.31 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.31 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.027 | 1.520 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.45 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.39 | 5.51 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.76 | 30.53 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.99 | 37.79 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement