Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs RWMFX
KCXIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs RWMFX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Idx I
Price$20.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.64M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.82
Change+$0.21 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.73B
KCXIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. KCXIX (292M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than KCXIX: RWMFX (1.41) vs KCXIX (0.93). KCXIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: KCXIX (6 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). KCXIX (0.43) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. KCXIX (3.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCXIX: RWMFX (250) vs KCXIX (25000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. RWMFX (5.30). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.36 vs. RWMFX (47.43).
| KCXIX | RWMFX | KCXIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.31 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.31 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.356 | 11.486 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.41 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.50 | 5.30 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.55 | 32.83 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.36 | 47.43 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement