Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs RWEBX
KCXIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs RWEBX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Idx I
Price$20.95
Change+$0.10 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.3M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.86
Change+$0.31 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
KCXIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. RWEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Buy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. KCXIX (290M). KCXIX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: KCXIX (0.94) vs RWEBX (0.74). KCXIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: KCXIX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than KCXIX (0.43). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. KCXIX (3.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCXIX: RWEBX (250) vs KCXIX (25000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. RWEBX (3.92). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 90.43 vs. RWEBX (40.45).
| KCXIX | RWEBX | KCXIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.06 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.06 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.795 | 11.070 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 290M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.17 | 3.92 | 285% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.89 | 26.97 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.43 | 40.45 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement