Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs RWEBX
KCXIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs RWEBX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Idx I
Price$20.66
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.65M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
KCXIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. KCXIX (305M). KCXIX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: KCXIX (0.90) vs RWEBX (0.78). KCXIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: KCXIX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than KCXIX (0.43). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. KCXIX (13.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCXIX: RWEBX (250) vs KCXIX (25000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.39 vs. RWEBX (4.66). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 74.99 vs. RWEBX (33.53).
| KCXIX | RWEBX | KCXIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.06 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.06 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.027 | 1.452 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.78 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.39 | 4.66 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.76 | 27.48 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.99 | 33.53 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers