Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFEX
KCVSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFEX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$18.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.95M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.79
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
KCVSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. KCVSX (281M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than KCVSX: RMFEX (1.53) vs KCVSX (1.38). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). KCVSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.74 vs. KCVSX (5.61). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 71.59 vs. RMFEX (62.99).
| KCVSX | RMFEX | KCVSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.792 | 11.527 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.53 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | 11.74 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 32.08 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.59 | 62.99 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.32 | 88.96 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers