Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$18.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.6M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. KCVSX (285M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: KCVSX (1.34) vs RMFCX (1.24). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. KCVSX (4.68). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 80.91 vs. RMFCX (63.20).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.729 | 13.245 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.24 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.68 | 6.41 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.06 | 42.10 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.91 | 63.20 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.06 | 103.62 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement