Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$19.26
Change-$0.05 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.25M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.18
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.34B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. KCVSX (302M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: KCVSX (1.27) vs RMFCX (1.18). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. KCVSX (0.36). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.08 vs. RMFCX (52.85).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.243 | 14.983 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.18 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.36 | 5.51 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.04 | 27.11 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.08 | 52.85 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.86 | 89.59 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers