Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$19.72
Change+$0.11 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.8M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.96
Change+$0.31 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. KCVSX (309M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: KCVSX (1.27) vs RMFCX (1.18). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. KCVSX (5.30). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.84 vs. RMFCX (54.87).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.690 | 16.369 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.18 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | 8.82 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.78 | 30.01 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.84 | 54.87 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.71 | 97.71 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers