Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$18.15
Change+$0.12 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.76M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. KCVSX (279M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: KCVSX (1.38) vs RMFCX (1.27). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. KCVSX (7.32). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 77.10 vs. RMFCX (61.83).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.970 | 9.596 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.32 | 11.47 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.67 | 29.27 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.10 | 61.83 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement