Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$19.62
Change+$1.00 (+5.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.67M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. KCVSX (330M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVSX (1.25) vs RMEBX (1.08). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (11 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). KCVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.60 vs. RMEBX (7.30). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 53.81 vs. RMEBX (43.15).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.802 | 2.231 | 350% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.08 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.60 | 7.30 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.64 | 28.21 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.81 | 43.15 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.63 | 103.95 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers