Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$18.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.95M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. KCVSX (281M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVSX (1.38) vs RMEBX (1.12). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. KCVSX (5.61). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 71.59 vs. RMEBX (59.35).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.792 | 11.253 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.12 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | 11.26 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 30.31 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.59 | 59.35 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.32 | 80.17 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers