Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCISX vs VFWPX
KCISX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts KCISX vs VFWPX
Knights of Columbus International Eq S
Price$14.09
Change-$0.20 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.96M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$137.92
Change-$1.89 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
KCISX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCISX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCISX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. KCISX (233M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than KCISX: VFWPX (2.83) vs KCISX (2.16). KCISX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: KCISX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). KCISX (1.22) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). KCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). KCISX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: KCISX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). KCISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. VFWPX (12.63). KCISX return over 5 years is better than : 51.32 vs. VFWPX (44.28).
| KCISX | VFWPX | KCISX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.03 | 4,067% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.976 | 15.308 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 65.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 2.83 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.90 | 12.63 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.15 | 34.78 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.32 | 44.28 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers