Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCIIX vs VFWPX
KCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts KCIIX vs VFWPX
Knights of Columbus International Eq I
Price$14.14
Change-$0.20 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.64M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$137.92
Change-$1.89 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
KCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCIIX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. KCIIX (230M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than KCIIX: VFWPX (2.83) vs KCIIX (2.24). KCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: KCIIX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). KCIIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). KCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). KCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: KCIIX (25000) vs VFWPX (100000000). KCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.96 vs. VFWPX (12.63). KCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 52.24 vs. VFWPX (44.28).
| KCIIX | VFWPX | KCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.03 | 3,667% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.03 | 3,733% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.036 | 15.308 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 65.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 2.83 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 12.63 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.52 | 34.78 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.24 | 44.28 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.02 | 42.92 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement