Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCIIX vs VFWPX
KCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts KCIIX vs VFWPX
Knights of Columbus International Eq I
Price$14.54
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.75M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.93
Change-$0.24 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
KCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCIIX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. KCIIX (235M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than KCIIX: VFWPX (2.76) vs KCIIX (2.28). KCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: KCIIX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). KCIIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). KCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). KCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: KCIIX (25000) vs VFWPX (100000000). KCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.80 vs. VFWPX (17.62). KCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 45.92 vs. VFWPX (42.21).
| KCIIX | VFWPX | KCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.03 | 3,667% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.03 | 3,733% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.522 | 19.699 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 68B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 2.76 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.80 | 17.62 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.64 | 40.67 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.92 | 42.21 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.62 | 53.63 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers