Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCIIX vs VFWPX
KCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts KCIIX vs VFWPX
Knights of Columbus International Eq I
Price$14.81
Change+$0.17 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.62M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$146.57
Change+$1.25 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
KCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCIIX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. KCIIX (240M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than KCIIX: VFWPX (2.68) vs KCIIX (2.23). KCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: KCIIX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). KCIIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). KCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). KCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: KCIIX (25000) vs VFWPX (100000000). KCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.14 vs. VFWPX (15.96). KCIIX (42.49) and VFWPX (40.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| KCIIX | VFWPX | KCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.03 | 3,667% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.03 | 3,733% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.755 | 21.701 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 71.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 2.68 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.14 | 15.96 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 47.91 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.49 | 40.89 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.56 | 69.76 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers