Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGSX vs RGEBX
KCGSX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCGSX vs RGEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$23.20
Change-$1.46 (-5.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.87M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
KCGSX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGSX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGSX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KCGSX (284M). KCGSX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KCGSX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KCGSX (11 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than KCGSX (0.86). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: KCGSX (0) vs RGEBX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. RGEBX (1.80). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.79 vs. RGEBX (9.88).
| KCGSX | RGEBX | KCGSX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.08 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.08 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.444 | -1.057 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | 1.80 | 577% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.80 | 41.63 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.79 | 9.88 | 332% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.73 | 110.02 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers