Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGSX vs RGAHX
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KCGSX vs RGAHX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$23.20
Change-$1.46 (-5.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.87M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGSX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KCGSX (284M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: RGAHX (0.43) vs KCGSX (0.00). KCGSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KCGSX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KCGSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. RGAHX (2.79). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.79 vs. RGAHX (13.96).
| KCGSX | RGAHX | KCGSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.444 | -1.010 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | 2.79 | 371% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.80 | 45.40 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.79 | 13.96 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.73 | 119.50 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers