Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGSX vs RGAHX
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KCGSX vs RGAHX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$25.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.71M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.85
Change+$0.38 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGSX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. KCGSX (277M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: RGAHX (0.44) vs KCGSX (0.00). KCGSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KCGSX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KCGSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.46 vs. RGAHX (7.14). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.20 vs. RGAHX (32.51).
| KCGSX | RGAHX | KCGSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.173 | 19.104 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 277M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.46 | 7.14 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.32 | 62.15 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.20 | 32.51 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.95 | 93.22 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers