Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGSX vs RGAHX
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KCGSX vs RGAHX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$25.11
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.45M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGSX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. KCGSX (283M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: RGAHX (0.44) vs KCGSX (0.00). KCGSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KCGSX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KCGSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.40 vs. RGAHX (9.02). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 54.11 vs. RGAHX (40.79).
| KCGSX | RGAHX | KCGSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.896 | 19.894 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.40 | 9.02 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.57 | 65.43 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.11 | 40.79 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement