Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGSX vs RGACX
KCGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KCGSX vs RGACX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$23.37
Change-$0.07 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.15M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
KCGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KCGSX (264M). RGACX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs KCGSX (0.00). KCGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KCGSX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than KCGSX (0.86). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: KCGSX (0) vs RGACX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.71 vs. RGACX (14.08). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| KCGSX | RGACX | KCGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.518 | 14.044 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.71 | 14.08 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.50 | 41.19 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.83 | 41.95 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.19 | 83.68 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement