Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGIX vs RGACX
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KCGIX vs RGACX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$24.64
Change+$0.14 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.99M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGIX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGIX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KCGIX (277M). RGACX pays higher dividends than KCGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs KCGIX (0.03). KCGIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KCGIX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than KCGIX (0.76). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: RGACX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.30 vs. RGACX (11.01). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 50.52 vs. RGACX (37.85).
| KCGIX | RGACX | KCGIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.971 | 17.655 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 277M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.30 | 11.01 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.61 | 70.57 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.52 | 37.85 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.39 | 96.78 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers