Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGIX vs RGACX
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KCGIX vs RGACX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$23.52
Change-$0.07 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.15M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGIX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KCGIX (264M). RGACX pays higher dividends than KCGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs KCGIX (0.06). KCGIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KCGIX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than KCGIX (0.76). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: RGACX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.82 vs. RGACX (14.08). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.71 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| KCGIX | RGACX | KCGIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.608 | 14.044 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.07 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.82 | 14.08 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.07 | 41.19 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.71 | 41.95 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.37 | 83.68 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement