Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGIX vs RGACX
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KCGIX vs RGACX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$24.06
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.28M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGIX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGIX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KCGIX (282M). RGACX pays higher dividends than KCGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs KCGIX (0.03). KCGIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KCGIX (11 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than KCGIX (0.76). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: RGACX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. RGACX (5.45). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 45.64 vs. RGACX (20.43).
| KCGIX | RGACX | KCGIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.93 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.93 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.194 | 8.821 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 282M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.64 | 5.45 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.21 | 63.36 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.64 | 20.43 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.31 | 92.34 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement