Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGIX vs RGACX
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KCGIX vs RGACX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$23.78
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.56M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGIX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. KCGIX (267M). RGACX pays higher dividends than KCGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs KCGIX (0.06). KCGIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KCGIX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than KCGIX (0.76). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: RGACX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.38 vs. RGACX (21.05). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.92 vs. RGACX (42.51).
| KCGIX | RGACX | KCGIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.853 | 16.155 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.07 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.38 | 21.05 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.24 | 51.55 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.92 | 42.51 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.04 | 97.10 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers